Meeting CANopen Special Interest Group Lift 2011-05: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[de:Treffen_der_CANopen_Spezial_Interest_Group_Lift_5-2011]] | [[de:Treffen_der_CANopen_Spezial_Interest_Group_Lift_5-2011]] | ||
On May 11th 2011 a meeting of the SIG Lift took place at CiA | On May 11th 2011 a meeting of the SIG Lift took place at CiA office Nuremberg. | ||
After a review of the last meeting and the comments to the new version 2.1 of the specification, there was a discussion on the submitted enhancments regarding a tunneling of messages for monitoring tools, virtual inputs for the detection of persons in the lift car and in front of the doors, new parameters for the drive unit, COB-IDs for tunneling the control messages in a group of lifts. Furthermore the topic of implementing an energy controller as a virtual device was declined. A virtual device for quality measurements was also declined by the group. | After a review of the last meeting and the comments to the new version 2.1 of the specification, there was a discussion on the submitted enhancments regarding a tunneling of messages for monitoring tools, virtual inputs for the detection of persons in the lift car and in front of the doors, new parameters for the drive unit, COB-IDs for tunneling the control messages in a group of lifts. Furthermore the topic of implementing an energy controller as a virtual device was declined. A virtual device for quality measurements was also declined by the group. | ||
Revision as of 15:34, 3 September 2013
On May 11th 2011 a meeting of the SIG Lift took place at CiA office Nuremberg.
After a review of the last meeting and the comments to the new version 2.1 of the specification, there was a discussion on the submitted enhancments regarding a tunneling of messages for monitoring tools, virtual inputs for the detection of persons in the lift car and in front of the doors, new parameters for the drive unit, COB-IDs for tunneling the control messages in a group of lifts. Furthermore the topic of implementing an energy controller as a virtual device was declined. A virtual device for quality measurements was also declined by the group.
Then the extention of the CANopen-Lift Demonstrator has been discussed.
Furthermore a procedure for an automatically software update function for a complete lift was discussed.